Archimago wrote: 
> When I get around to it to check out the dealers in town, will ask about
> borrowing something "cherished"!
> 
> Over the years I have never seen any audiophile magazine publish the
> graphs I've shown - ie. exactly identical graphs for various digital
> cables - has anyone? Maybe an independent publication like 'The Audio
> Critic' may have.
> 
> It's of course not in the interest of advertisers / manufacturers but I
> assume also the readership hasn't been demanding for it either... I
> wonder do most people accept the idea that measurements are worthless,
> or that the "sound of music is too complex" to be correlated to
> measurements, or maybe most audiophiles just know intuitively the truth
> and just don't want to know.
> 
> Sorry to hear about your experience with high-priced-defective-by-design
> cables. Just terrible. And I assume the reviewers must have just loved
> those cables.

Exactly +1 don't fel sorry for me :)

These Magazines are spreading the idea that measurements  are worthless
( go figure ) .
There is a kernel of truth in this as always but widely overused by
audiophiles .

In the 70's there was a "spec" war focusing on certain aspect but
neglecting others . This have giving rise to the myth the negative
feedback is bad and that certain details would dissapear ? Of course by
unknown mechanism that no audiophile has to explain because it just is
so ;)

There is sometimes not a very clear correlation to what some
measurements tells us vs audibility . But something's are clear and
proved ,like with modern well designed equipment with very tiny amount
of distortion and noise ,no one can tell them apart .
A fact that Audio critic used to piont out , very good magazine btw .

But in the case of these digital cables you have a situation where there
is *no* difference , if the magazines did these kind of measurement they
would give away mathematical proof that they are lying , and it would be
possible to sue them .
If they claim that a more perky midrange and firmer bottom is the case
on the latest forgettable jazz Muzak girl record .

That don't stop audiophiles , must be the ether or flogiston that
transports these signals directly to,the brain as they electro
acoustically don't happen at all :)


------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mnyb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4143
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=98620

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to