JerryS wrote: > Lots of references to ABX testing in this forum. Is there any > theoretical reason why this should be more robust than triangle testing? I'd be interested to see the science behind it, because there is a subtle difference in the methodology. But either way you're picking the odd one out. The only difference with ABX is that the randomness is limited to third sample (X). You're always getting either ABA or ABB.
To turn the tables, why should the possibility of getting BBA or AAB make more sense intuitively? Note also that in terms of identifying the different one (or the matching one), the triangle's BAA and BAB are equivalent to ABX's ABB and ABA, respectively. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ aubuti's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2074 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=98828 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
