Archimago wrote: > > Notice the latest posting on AudioStream today? >
A criticism of the common audiophile definitions of objectivist and subjectivist was the opening shot in my HE2005 debate with Atkinson. Hey, its only 10 years later and Atkinson's disciples are beginning to understand my schtick! > > Hmmm, a step in the right direction? > I remember its current proprietor when he was just another poster on the Stereophile forum. I am unsure if he is rational enough to step in the right direction and play his stereo at the same time. > > Of course, I've been banned from posting for some reason even though I > don't think I was rude or terribly argumentative! > Of course. Subjectivists have to be in control or else some objectivist weisenheimer will hand them their heads on a platter. > > "No one in their right mind dismisses the importance of objective > attributes when it comes to the design and manufacturer of audio > components. And no one in their right mind would dismiss the importance > of measurements after-the-fact in determining if a given component is > performing up to spec." > That's a long way from a real-world psychoacoustically-based understanding of the relationship of measurements and how the ear/brain work. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ arnyk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=64365 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103842 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
