SBGK wrote: > > > Now what about answering my questions to you about how you can measure > something when you can't hear any differences, most people would hear a > difference and then investigate why.
Measuring differences is pretty easy. At a sufficiently microscopic level everything is changing all of the time. Ever hear of random noise? It is part of every listening experience and it is measurably constantly changing. Ever hear of the thresholds of audibility? They suggest very strongly that there can be many things that measure different but sound the same. Perceiving audible differences is also very easy. But many of those differences lack reliability. IOW the harder you work to nail them down, the more elusive they become. Your post seems to be based on the belief that people measure differences and never take one little baby step to investigate way. Of course that isn't true - we have excellent records of people measuring differences and investigating why going at least back to Helmholtz: 1821-1894. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermann_von_Helmholtz Perhaps this is just a problem of ignorance - ignorance on the part of people who still believe that people have been so stupid measure differences and never take one little baby step to investigate way, when in fact these matters have been under investigation for a minimum of 100s of years and many things about them are well understood. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ arnyk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=64365 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=104136 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
