marcoc1712 wrote: > I really don't think so, actually very poor 'measuring systems' could > reach -140 db and more, actually -90 db is not a so good S/N ratio for a > decent DAC.
Did you actually read archimago's conclusions? > I've posted mine, if you don't believe they are true, is not up to > me... How about answering the follow-up questions? > Where are yours or from "other people"? Please point me to ANY > measurement where CPU load - at same samplerate, channels, endianess and > dept - is better for flac than for Wav. Please scroll up. "To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a solid gilt edge that will fool many people" - Paul W Klipsch, 1953 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Julf's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=42050 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=104227 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
