Julf wrote: 
> Yes and no. Had you simply stated "I know there is no audible
> difference, but I have other reasons", it probably would not have caused
> any reactions. But instead you argued for the audibility of the
> differences, just like below:

Why I'd have to say samething that I dont'd believe to? Just to make you
happy? By the way, I've just sad that -90 db means allmost nothing, if
you are not considering other factors, nothing else. Is this the same? I
think not.

Julf wrote: 
> 
> No, -90dB means "probably at the limit of the measuring system".

I really don't think so, actually very poor 'measuring systems' could
reach -140 db and more, actually -90 db is not a so good S/N ratio for a
decent DAC. 

At least to me - this mean thart a - little as you want - difference IS
in place. Enought to be directly eard? Who knows, here is where
acoustics and psycoacoustic take place... Never sad nothing different. 

You want other believe it's impossible, that's hard, but it's up to you,
I'm happy with You thinking it is...

Julf wrote: 
> 
> We have asked you for details about your measurements. Meanwhile several
> people have pointed out measurements that show less load when using
> flac.

I've posted mine, if you don't  believe they are true, is not up to
me... Where are yours or form "other people"? Please point me to ANY
measurement where CPU load - at same samplerate, channels, endianess and
dept - is better for flac than for Wav.


Were I'm asking to proof that something does not exists? I'm just asking
you proof that Wav consume more CPU than FLAC, could you?



____________________________________________________________
SB+, Klimo Merlino + Kent Gold, Monitor Audio Studio 20 Gold SE+, Klimo
reference and DIS Interconnect.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
marcoc1712's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=34842
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=104227

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to