So the web site Audiostream, a "spin off"/sub web site of the main Stereophile web site puts up a couple of posts showing that the majority of the site's readers support the site's brand of subjective evaluation of audio equipment. Wow what a big surprise! Perhaps a web site devoted to autoerotic asphyxiation will now feature some showing that the majority of the site's enjoy this practice. Now wouldn't that be another big surprise.
Mr. Lavorgna fails to mention what constitutes a "toxic" comment or better yet provide a rules of conduct for the comments so that individuals with different opinions might be able to post comments without being banned. Note: I just posted a comment on Audiostream asking Mr. Lavorgna to post some kind of rules of conduct. While I do not have even the remotest chance of countering the outright lies that make up at least 90% of present day advertising and politics, I'm hoping that I, along with other members of what I'm terming "the loud minority", can have some small chance of countering the outright lies that often appear on many of the audiophile web sites. Living Rm: Transporter-SimAudio pre/power amps-Vandersteen 3A Sign. & sub Home Theater: Touch-Marantz HTR-Energy Veritas 2.1 & Linn sub Computer Rm: Touch-Headroom Desktop w/DAC-Aragon amp-Energy Veritas 2.1 & Energy sub Bedroom: Touch-HR Desktop w/DAC-Audio Refinement amp-Energy Veritas 2.0 Guest Rm: Duet-Sony soundbar Garage: SB3-JVC compact system Controls: iPeng; SB Controller; Moose & Muso Server: LMS 7.9 on dedicated windows 10 computer w/2 Drobos 'Last.fm' (http://www.last.fm/user/jazzfann/) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ralphpnj's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10827 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=105254 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
