Hificricketboy wrote: > I'm sure I've done it wrong in someone's eyes. But, hey, it's my money > my ears and my hifi. > > The OP is using a Transporter, which is an extremely good piece of kit, > as a digital source. At £700 or whatever it cost i would guess £30 for a > cable is not beyond his resources. >
So, you recommend that people spend as much money as they can, regardless of any possible benefits or outcome? > > There's plenty of choice of reasonably priced cables on Amazon. You can > choose from £10 up to something more esoteric. > Actually, they have product starting at more like £2. https://www.amazon.co.uk/1m-TWIN-RCA-Cable-Premium/dp/B005ZPHKGW/ref=sr_1_5?ie=UTF8&qid=1466537111&sr=8-5&keywords=rca+interconnect+cables Is this sort of statement characteristic of the accuracy of your advice? > > I'm checking out as I'm not a 'believer' that you need to spend a > fortune on cables. > Is it possible that you're checking out because people aren't swallowing this tall tale, hook, line, and sinker? > > But I do think there is some benefit in moving on from the black boot > laces you get "free" with some kit. > Such as? > > As I've already said, each to their own. So you think that science has nothing to do with this? IOW, reality is whatever a person might think it is? ------------------------------------------------------------------------ arnyk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=64365 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=105775
_______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
