drmatt wrote: > But like all hypotheses, you only need to find -one- person who can > consistently tell the difference and you have disproved the theory that > "no-one can tell the difference"... And the crucial word here is *consistently*. If you run a trial with 20 people, it is statisically very likely that one of them will "pass the test". What then needs to be done is to repeat the test and have *the same person* pass the test again. If they don't, it's just a standard case of regression to the mean.
Transporter -> ATC SCM100A ------------------------------------------------------------------------ cliveb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=348 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=105816 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
