> Then, I will try sysfs instead of /proc.
> Give me some time.
>
> But I don't think it is good to implement
>> echo add:1:/mnt/path > /proc/fs/aufs/0/branches
>
> The (re)mount interface is better.
Thank you very much for your consideration!
I like the (re)mount very much, but will your modification fix the
problem I reported? (the kernel oops or whatever it was in kernel/exit.c)
To make things more clear, I don't call 'mount' command with a huge list
of branches to mount the union, but instead I create the union in /union
mount -t aufs -o br:/memory=rw aufs /union
and then I add branches one by one, by using
mount -o remount,add:1:/mnt/images/image1 aufs /union
for example. This works OK and branches are added to the union, but
remounting the union ro causes the oops I sent you. Do you still agree
it's a problem of the lenght of mount arguments?
Tomas M
slax.org
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier.
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
