On Mon, 2013-09-30 at 12:33 +0900, sf...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
> Hello Ben,
> 
> Ben Hutchings:
> > Thanks for maintaining the 3.2.x branch.  I didn't take all the changes
> > from it but I cherry-picked these to include in a stable update for the
> > Debian kernel:
> 
> The current version of aufs in debian is aufs3.2 20130204, right?
>
> 28de369 2013-02-04 aufs3.2 20130204
> 
> And if we run "git log --no-merges 28de369..aufs3.2.x", we get 85
> commits. You chose 12 of them and I guess you want the fixes for
> critical problmes only, but I'd suggest you to pick up all 85, including
> the updated version string.

So far as I could tell, the rest were new features - which aren't
suitable for a Debian stable update - or adding donors to the
documentation.  Are you concerned that some bug fix might have a
dependency I didn't notice?

> If you really really don't want all, I'd suggest you to pick these
> commits too and change the version string to something like "debianized
> 20130204".
[...]

Well I also cherry-picked the change of version string to '3.2.x', which
seemed suitably ambiguous. :-)  The Debian changelog lists the
cherry-picked changes.

I can change the version string again if you think it should have
'debian' in it.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Life is like a sewer:
what you get out of it depends on what you put into it.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
October Webinars: Code for Performance
Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance.
Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from 
the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register >
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60133471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk

Reply via email to