Ben Hutchings: > So far as I could tell, the rest were new features - which aren't > suitable for a Debian stable update - or adding donors to the > documentation. Are you concerned that some bug fix might have a > dependency I didn't notice?
I understand that there are unimportant (for debian) commits in all 85, and you exclude them. But the commit list I wrote in my previous mail contains important ones. So they are recommendation from me. Of course the choice is yours. If we think the word "bugfix" strictly, you should pick ca0e87b 2013-04-20 aufs: new copyup 6/6, the inode attributes 724b70b 2013-04-20 aufs: new copyup 5/6, actually unlock the parent and relock ead9579 2013-04-20 aufs: new copyup 4/6, aufs_rename() always copies-up the src dentry 8b550ff 2013-04-20 aufs: new copyup 3/6, aufs_link() copyup dentry using src_dentry's name 8a4170f 2013-04-20 aufs: new copyup 2/6, au_pin supports temporary unlock/relock c90d846 2013-04-20 aufs: new copyup 1/6, copyup as a hidden name too. They are for the bug Al Viro pointed out. As my very personal opinion, the problem will not occur while it is surely a bug. Theoritically it should be fixed and these commits did. > I can change the version string again if you think it should have > 'debian' in it. Yes please. It is important. J. R. Okajima ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ October Webinars: Code for Performance Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60133471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
