Hi there Muflone reason I want this to exist is 1. removing it would cause a lot of breakage and issues not just for me but for all the people using my package and I feel like this was a nuclear out of nowhere solution instead of just contacting me and making suggesting instead of threating to have my package removed and should have been handled way better then this.
2. I am one developer and this easily helps me maintain and control the electron versioning for all my software as I now use the repo packages of electron and the AUR if the package doesn't yet exist and if anything goes wrong or a update with electron causes any issues I can easily revert the version of just libelectron-electron-meta and fix the issues for all my packages instead of painstakingly go through each and every package and not have control of what version of electron my software uses This doesn't break any rules and this meta package makes it a lot more convenient to ensure that the users experience of my packages is consistent, well maintained and updated. Thanks for the reply corey On Tue, 23 Sept 2025, 12:48 am Muflone, <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Corey > > >Hi guys I have been in conversation with a someone on my AUR package who > decided to request my package to.be removed > > > Please provide valid reasons for this package existence and the reason to > keep it in AUR. > > In the forum where you wrote previously someone suggested you some changes > to the libelectron packages but they weren't addressed. > > Of course "it's useful for me" is not a meaningful reason. > > Regards > > Muflone >
