Also sorry for the multiple email replies but I had to add this to add
to my point, do you realize how much time I am saving with this meta
package, I am thinking and working smart not hard here as a single
developer for multiple packages that depend on electron but I have way
more control over electron versioning to ensure stability, if anything
goes wrong I can simply update libelectron-electron-meta once to solve
the issue for multiple packages allowing me to easily expand on more
packages and quickly fix and maintain in case of any issues arise
instead of either waiting for the developers and package maintainers to
update or downgrade the electron package and be stuck in limbo, then
what? I have to inform the users ooh I can't do anything about it and
you need to wait until Arch or the electron devs fix the issue? nah, I
can simply update the meta package to quickly resolve any issues. this
isn't harmful to you of the users nor is breaking the rules
So tell me why it needs to be removed when it's not affecting anyone nor
breaking the rules, if you can't tell me why or where this breaks any
rules then there is no reason to remove this and I feel like I am being
targeted yet again for no reason.
On 23/9/25 12:47 am, Muflone wrote:
Hi Corey
Hi guys I have been in conversation with a someone on my AUR package who
decided to request my package to.be removed
Please provide valid reasons for this package existence and the reason to keep
it in AUR.
In the forum where you wrote previously someone suggested you some changes to
the libelectron packages but they weren't addressed.
Of course "it's useful for me" is not a meaningful reason.
Regards
Muflone
