> do you realize how much time I am saving with this meta package What's stopping you from doing a sed replace from a small bash script?
Would save you the time, and not clutter the AUR. > this toxic place where it seems like no one has social skills ad thinks they need to tell everyone how to do everything This isn't winning you any points, maybe leave an email as a draft for a while next time if you're feeling frustrated, and get back to it a while later to revise it? It would help with the email being fractured too. > I would have to go go through and update all my packages just to fix this while getting complains that the apps stopped working That's why you're being suggested to update them now, to avoid this situation. Am sure there's no issue with giving you a little bit of time for migration if you need it and ask for it. Martin On Tue, Sep 23, 2025 at 4:44 AM Corey Bruce <[email protected]> wrote: > > Also sorry for the multiple email replies but I had to add this to add > to my point, do you realize how much time I am saving with this meta > package, I am thinking and working smart not hard here as a single > developer for multiple packages that depend on electron but I have way > more control over electron versioning to ensure stability, if anything > goes wrong I can simply update libelectron-electron-meta once to solve > the issue for multiple packages allowing me to easily expand on more > packages and quickly fix and maintain in case of any issues arise > instead of either waiting for the developers and package maintainers to > update or downgrade the electron package and be stuck in limbo, then > what? I have to inform the users ooh I can't do anything about it and > you need to wait until Arch or the electron devs fix the issue? nah, I > can simply update the meta package to quickly resolve any issues. this > isn't harmful to you of the users nor is breaking the rules > > So tell me why it needs to be removed when it's not affecting anyone nor > breaking the rules, if you can't tell me why or where this breaks any > rules then there is no reason to remove this and I feel like I am being > targeted yet again for no reason. > > > > On 23/9/25 12:47 am, Muflone wrote: > > Hi Corey > > > >> Hi guys I have been in conversation with a someone on my AUR package who > >> decided to request my package to.be removed > > > > Please provide valid reasons for this package existence and the reason to > > keep it in AUR. > > > > In the forum where you wrote previously someone suggested you some changes > > to the libelectron packages but they weren't addressed. > > > > Of course "it's useful for me" is not a meaningful reason. > > > > Regards > > > > Muflone
