Hello REDadm author
I am the upstream author and original developer of REDasm
(github.com/REDasmOrg, now github.com/redasm-dev) I develop this project
since 2017 under the Dax89 account on GitHub.
I am requesting removal of the following AUR packages:
- redasm (2.1.1.fix-2)
- redasm-beta (3.0.0.beta5-2)
- redasm-git (3.0.0.beta5.r32)
The redasm package fetches
https://github.com/REDasmOrg/REDasm.git#tag=v2.1.1-fix
<git+https://github.com/REDasmOrg/REDasm.git#tag=v2.1.1-fix> which seems
to be the only non-beta available on github, so it seems the correct
source to use for REDasm package.
The redasm-beta package fetches
https://github.com/REDasmOrg/REDasm.git#tag=v3.0.0-beta5 which seems to
be the latest available beta version before the 4.0 beta which was
released the same day you wrote your message.
The redasm-git package version is meaningless, the -git packages always
automatically use the latest commit in the git repository and they will
change the version number automatically.
At the actual state both the three packages suffer the same issue
reported in the comments about the minimum cmake version number.
Apart that issue I cannot see any reason to delete such package.
Do you plan to maintain these packages on AUR by yourself? In such case
you should file three orphan requests (
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/AUR_submission_guidelines#Requests )
for being unmaintained. I don't plan to remove these packages from AUR
as deleting them won't solve anything. If you don't plan to maintain
them I'll give others chances to maintain the packages properly instead
of deleting them.
I've added Fabio to CC, to make him aware.
Best regards
--
Muflone
