Is there any more waiting needed? I did the standard procedure as requested by 
flagging packages.
4 days are passed and almost a whole month since my first request on GitHub

On 6/28/26 16:32, Muflone wrote:

> Hello REDasm author
>
>> The redasm package fetches 
>> [https://github.com/REDasmOrg/REDasm.git#tag=v2.1.1-fix](git+https://github.com/REDasmOrg/REDasm.git#tag=v2.1.1-fix)
>>  which seems to be the only non-beta available on github, so it seems the 
>> correct source to use for REDasm package.
>>
>> The redasm-beta package fetches 
>> https://github.com/REDasmOrg/REDasm.git#tag=v3.0.0-beta5 which seems to be 
>> the latest available beta version before the 4.0 beta which was released the 
>> same day you wrote your message.
>>
>> The redasm-git package version is meaningless, the -git packages always 
>> automatically use the latest commit in the git repository and they will 
>> change the version number automatically.
>>
>> At the actual state both the three packages suffer the same issue reported 
>> in the comments about the minimum cmake version number.
>>
>> Apart that issue I cannot see any reason to delete such package.
>>
>> Do you plan to maintain these packages on AUR by yourself? In such case you 
>> should file three orphan requests ( 
>> https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/AUR_submission_guidelines#Requests ) for 
>> being unmaintained. I don't plan to remove these packages from AUR as 
>> deleting them won't solve anything. If you don't plan to maintain them I'll 
>> give others chances to maintain the packages properly instead of deleting 
>> them.
>
> Removing your quotes as your reply was sent to me off-list only:
>
> I see from https://github.com/FabioLolix/PKGBUILD/issues/23 you reported 
> Fabio the current issue with the packages and he's already aware, having 
> replied you.
>
> So, in order to give you maintainership or time to Fabio to fix the packages, 
> please send:
>
> - deletion request for redasm package as it's outdated and no newer versions 
> exist
>
> - orphan request for redasm-git as it needs changes/rewrite, no reason to 
> delete it if you maintain it
>
> - orphan request for redasm-beta to update the version, no reason to delete 
> it if you maintain it
>
> Regards
>
> --
> Muflone

Reply via email to