Hello REDasm author
The redasm package fetches
https://github.com/REDasmOrg/REDasm.git#tag=v2.1.1-fix
<git+https://github.com/REDasmOrg/REDasm.git#tag=v2.1.1-fix> which
seems to be the only non-beta available on github, so it seems the
correct source to use for REDasm package.
The redasm-beta package fetches
https://github.com/REDasmOrg/REDasm.git#tag=v3.0.0-beta5 which seems
to be the latest available beta version before the 4.0 beta which was
released the same day you wrote your message.
The redasm-git package version is meaningless, the -git packages
always automatically use the latest commit in the git repository and
they will change the version number automatically.
At the actual state both the three packages suffer the same issue
reported in the comments about the minimum cmake version number.
Apart that issue I cannot see any reason to delete such package.
Do you plan to maintain these packages on AUR by yourself? In such
case you should file three orphan requests (
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/AUR_submission_guidelines#Requests )
for being unmaintained. I don't plan to remove these packages from AUR
as deleting them won't solve anything. If you don't plan to maintain
them I'll give others chances to maintain the packages properly
instead of deleting them.
Removing your quotes as your reply was sent to me off-list only:
I see from https://github.com/FabioLolix/PKGBUILD/issues/23 you reported
Fabio the current issue with the packages and he's already aware, having
replied you.
So, in order to give you maintainership or time to Fabio to fix the
packages, please send:
- deletion request for redasm package as it's outdated and no newer
versions exist
- orphan request for redasm-git as it needs changes/rewrite, no reason
to delete it if you maintain it
- orphan request for redasm-beta to update the version, no reason to
delete it if you maintain it
Regards
--
Muflone
