re: IS28 droping in unintentionally from a thermal ..
it definitely will, because I did exactly that on an
early solo! .. it also loses a fair bit of height
being on the heavy side .. I've never done it since
then though, so it must have scared me sufficiently ..

 --- Derek Ruddock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 
> Spin proof? Our new DG1000 spins like a top!
> 
> I learnt to spin off the top of the winch in the UK,
> in a K7. It's a very different kettle of fish, as
> Harry notes, starting a spin at 1300 feet or so.
> Perhaps some of the accidents there were caused by
> instructors expecting the Pooch to recover like a
> K13 or K7. 
> 
> Regarding the IS28, I've spun them hundreds of
> times, and only had it tuck once. I've never been
> concerned with the spin characteristics of the 28,
> and recovery is always immediate.
> I've also never had a 28 drop into an incipient spin
> when thermalling, unlike a Pooch.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  -----Original Message-----
> From:         [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> On Behalf Of McLean Richard
> Sent: Wednesday, 22 September 2004 01:04 AM
> To:   Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in
> Australia.
> Subject:      Re: [Aus-soaring] IS28 ADs (was Reasons NOT
> to spin for fun)
> 
> Hi all - I thought we trained people to recover from
> spins because although our nice shiny new trainers
> are
> "spin-proof" most of our aging single seater fleet
> that the majority of inexperienced club pilots will
> fly are not? I just spent the weekend conducting
> spin-training in a puchacz ... and I did my own
> ab-initio training in an IS-28 ..the puch is much
> nicer to spin =) i don't "enjoy" spinning, but I'm
> definitely a better pilot for it. 
> 
> - Richard McLean
> 
>  --- Mark Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 
> > Harry Medlicott wrote:
> > 
> > > Spinning accidents don't normally happen at
> > altitude, it is the ones close
> > > to the ground that cause the accidents. Training
> > at altitude undertaking a
> > > number of turns might be fun but I doubt if it
> > saves many lives. What is
> > > needed is plenty of practice at instantly taking
> > the appropriate recovery
> > > action when a spin is developing and, yes,
> > preferably when and if the real
> > > thing happens, you are flying a docile glider.
> > > Why make life harder than we need to?
> > 
> > ANY flying activity close to the ground is more
> > hazardous than flying
> > a long way away from the ground.
> > 
> > When you're a long way away from the ground, the
> > only things that can
> > hurt you are overstressing the aircraft, hitting
> > another aircraft, or
> > climbing high enough to become hypoxic (which
> > usually causes one of
> > the other effects)
> > 
> > When you're close to the ground, there are all
> > manner of other
> > miscalculations and bad judgement calls which can
> > get you in trouble
> > by causing rapid height loss.  If the rapid height
> > loss doesn't
> > terminate abruptly upon contact with geography,
> the
> > pilots options
> > are still limited by the loss, which might result
> in
> > a high-risk,
> > badly-planned, unexpected outlanding.
> > 
> > If an aircraft's flight manual says it can spin, I
> > see no reason not
> > to spin it -- And furthermore, I see no reason not
> > to enjoy it.  Just
> > like you can enjoy loops, chandelles, steep turns
> > and whatever other
> > aerobatic maneuver the flight manual says you can
> > do.  However, as with
> > any other aerobatic maneuver, you should know your
> > aircraft and plan
> > what you're doing with full appreciation of your
> > abilities and
> > potential failings before you start, and you
> should
> > conduct those
> > options with adequate, well thought-out safety
> > margins.
> > 
> > (hmm - that isn't actually limited to aerobatics,
> is
> > it :-)
> > 
> > We're "making life harder than we need to" if we
> > conduct any
> > activity at all which limits our options when
> close
> > to the ground.
> > I know a lot of people who have a great time
> > spinning gliders, but
> > I don't know anyone who would do it below 1,500',
> > whether they're
> > in an IS-28, a Puchacz or anything else.
> > 
> > We teach pilots to perform turns at varying speeds
> > and bank angles,
> > we stuff up their circuits, we simulate cable
> > breaks, we talk them
> > through stalls -- These are all things which
> aren't
> > part of *normal*
> > flight, but which teach the trainee that when
> things
> > aren't normal
> > they can still extract themselves from the
> situation
> > safely and
> > confidently.  Why doens't a multi-turn spin at
> > height fit into that
> > mold?  And if it does, how can you say that you
> > doubt it saves
> > many lives?
> > 
> >    - mark
> 
> 
> 
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This communication, including any attachments, is
> confidential. If 
>  you are not the intended recipient, you should not
> read it - please 
>  contact me immediately, destroy it, and do not copy
> or use any part of 
>  this communication or disclose anything about it.
> 
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Aus-soaring mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To check or change subscription details, visit:
>
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring
>  

Find local movie times and trailers on Yahoo! Movies.
http://au.movies.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
Aus-soaring mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring

Reply via email to