I can confirm SRX is working fine on the above recommended versions on NBN. Confirmed working on 19.4R3 without needing to do anything fancy.
Tim Dykes M: 041 962 0603 E: ttdykes at gmail.com W: ifconfig-a.com On Fri, 15 Jan 2021 at 16:45, Tim Dykes <ttdy...@gmail.com> wrote: > Updates after a day of research and discussion with JTAC.... > > JTAC say there were known issues with how jdhcpd handled client-identifier > and that caused these issues. That was fixed in junos:19.2R3 junos:19.3R3 > junos:19.4R3 junos:20.1R2 junos:20.2R2 junos:20.3R1 > > There were reports that the order that the DHCP options were listed was > causing problems. Packet captures from our SRX seem to rule that out, they > look fine. > > Another forum says the SRX has a 255 end of option.. option, and that > causes the problem but all vendors I have checked today also sent that... > so dont think thats it. > > I've received two reports of it working for people without any issues, > and 2 reports of it having issues. The firmware versions that it works fine > on are both different and one of them is even 15X. > > I can't find any PR's to match what I am seeing so I can only assume they > are private. > > PPPOE seems to be fine across the board on HFC. > > Putting down as many notes here as possible so next time someone is trying > to get a link up like this there is some reference material to go off. > > I have to wait until late next week for the end client to update their SRX > to a newer code base inline with what JTAC say so until then I can't put > this issue to bed. > > Tim Dykes > > On Thu, 14 Jan 2021 at 14:40, Simon Dixon <si...@dicko.net.au> wrote: > >> >> Guessing your RE traffic CoS bits are set to default try setting them to >> BE with the following config >> >> set class-of-service host-outbound-traffic ieee-802.1 default be >> >> Regards >> >> Simon. >> >> >> On Thu, 14 Jan 2021 at 11:17, Tim Dykes <ttdy...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hey Guys, >>> >>> Anyone out there running a Juniper SRX on a NBN HFC link with Aussie BB? >>> >>> I'm having issues that sound like a DHCP problem where we can't get an >>> address. Searching around we have found references to a DHCP issue where >>> the juniper sends DHCP options out of order (or that NBN fiddles with >>> options in a way that only effects Juniper) but cannot find any definitive >>> answer or anything saying this was true/false fixed or unrelated. >>> >>> We are running JunOS 19X so would assume any horrible non compliant DHCP >>> bugs would be fixed. >>> >>> >>> Anyone able to throw me a working config or verify that there is/was a >>> known issue with this. >>> >>> Thanks. >>> >>> /Tim >>> _______________________________________________ >>> AusNOG mailing list >>> AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net >>> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog >>> >>
_______________________________________________ AusNOG mailing list AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog