On Thu, 2023-01-12 at 13:44 +0700, Robert Elz via austin-group-l at The
Open Group wrote:
> If there was anything to do here with uuencode/uudecode it would be
> to
> (again) consider removing them from the standard - but not because of
> security issues, just because they are now essentially obsolete.

It's the only portable way to encode/decode stuff to/from base64, which
may e.g. used if binary data (with 0x0) needs to be hold in a shell
variable.

IMO it should only be removed if replaced by the base64 utility.


Cheers,
Chris.

  • Re: Security... Alan Coopersmith via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • Re: Security... Robert Elz via austin-group-l at The Open Group
    • Re: Sec... Geoff Clare via austin-group-l at The Open Group
    • Re: Sec... Robert Elz via austin-group-l at The Open Group
      • Re:... Geoff Clare via austin-group-l at The Open Group
      • Re:... Bruce Korb via austin-group-l at The Open Group
    • Re: Sec... Alan Coopersmith via austin-group-l at The Open Group
      • Re:... Bruce Korb via austin-group-l at The Open Group
        • ... Christoph Anton Mitterer via austin-group-l at The Open Group
      • Re:... Geoff Clare via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • Re: Security... Christoph Anton Mitterer via austin-group-l at The Open Group
    • Re: Sec... Thorsten Glaser via austin-group-l at The Open Group
      • Re:... Christoph Anton Mitterer via austin-group-l at The Open Group
        • ... Chet Ramey via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • Re: Security... Robert Elz via austin-group-l at The Open Group

Reply via email to