No, DNS Update is the name of a protocol. We aren't talking about a DNS Update—we are talking about the DNS Update Protocol [RFC2136]. We normally leave out "Protocol" but it should be assumed when you are considering whether an article is needed there.
> On 30 May 2025, at 18:10, Sarah Tarrant <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Stuart and Ted, > > Thank you for your reply. We have updated the document accordingly. > > We have one remaining question, regarding: >> * I don’t think writing “a <proper-noun>” is right. We wouldn’t write >> “Implementations of *a* TCP” or “Implementations of *a* DHCP”. >> >> OLD: >> Implementations of a >> traditional DNS Update [RFC2136] do not normally provide a way to >> enforce a constraint of this type. >> NEW: >> Implementations of >> traditional DNS Update [RFC2136] do not normally provide a way to >> enforce a constraint of this type. > > We hesitate to make this change as it currently reads "Implementations of a > traditional DNS Update" (a traditional ... Update) and not "Implementations > of a traditional DNS" (a traditional DNS). > > Would you like to remove both "Update" and "a"? > > CURRENT: > Implementations of a > traditional DNS Update [RFC2136] do not normally provide a way to > enforce a constraint of this type. > > NEW: > Implementations of > traditional DNS [RFC2136] do not normally provide a way to > enforce a constraint of this type. > > > The updated files have been posted here (please refresh): > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9665.txt > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9665.pdf > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9665.html > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9665.xml > > The relevant diff files have been posted here (please refresh): > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9665-diff.html (comprehensive diff) > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9665-auth48diff.html (AUTH48 changes > only) > > Note that it may be necessary for you to refresh your browser to view the > most recent version. > > For the AUTH48 status of this document, please see: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9665 > > Thank you, > RFC Editor/st > >> On May 29, 2025, at 11:09 PM, Stuart Cheshire <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> One correction. In my last email I missed the word “Section”. >> >> OLD: >> <xref target="RFC1035" section="3.5" sectionFormat="of"/> >> <xref target="RFC3596" section="2.5" sectionFormat="of"/> >> >> NEW: >> Section <xref target="RFC1035" section="3.5" sectionFormat="bare"/> >> Section <xref target="RFC3596" section="2.5" sectionFormat="bare”/ >> >> Stuart Cheshire >> > -- auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
