> On 6 Sep 2025, at 17:19, John R Levine <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>>> Current A:
>>>    Traditional DNS notifications [RFC1996], which are here referred to
>>>    as "NOTIFY(SOA)", are sent from a primary server to a secondary
>>>    server, to minimize the latter's convergence time to a new version of
>>>    the zone.
>>> Current B:
>>>    The basic idea was to augment
>>>    the traditional "pull" mechanism (a periodic SOA query) with a "push"
>>>    mechanism (a Notify) for a common case that was otherwise very
>>>    inefficient (due to either slow convergence or wasteful and overly
>>>    frequent scanning of the primary for changes).
>>> Current C:
>>>    This
>>>    opens up the possibility of having an arbitrary party (e.g., a side-
>>>    car service) send the notifications, enabling this functionality even
>>>    before the emergence of native support in nameserver software.
>>> -->
>> 
>> Instead of "native" (C), please use "built-in".
>> 
>> I have no suggestion for how to replace "traditional" (A and B).
> 
> I think A and B are fine.  They're referring to practice within the IETF and 
> DNS operations.  I suppose you could change them to "existing" but that 
> wouldn't be as clear.

I also think that “traditional” is ok. But if we really should change it then 
my suggestion would be to change “traditional” into “original”.

>> Section 4.2
>> OLD (current, after RFC editing)
>>      Therefore, it is RECOMMENDED that the child delay sending notifications
>> NEW
>>      Therefore, the child SHOULD delay sending notifications
>> 
>> (Rationale: currently, one may read "child delay" as a noun)
> 
> I would change the SHOULDs in 4.2 and 4.2.1 to MUST unless we can describe 
> situations where interop would be better if you don't.

I think MUST is too strong and SHOULD is the right emphasis in this case.

> Pending resolution of that last suggestion, I approve everything else.

Same here. And thanks to the RFC-Editor team for the help with improving the 
document.

Regards,
Johan Stenstam
Swedish Internet Foundation

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

-- 
auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to