+1

Thanks,
Jasdip

> On Oct 9, 2025, at 4:35 PM, Tom Harrison <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi Alice,
> 
>> On Thu, Oct 09, 2025 at 11:06:54AM -0700, Alice Russo wrote:
>> Thank you for your replies; please see one follow-up below. The revised 
>> files are here (please refresh):
>>  https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9877.html
>>  https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9877.txt
>>  https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9877.pdf
>>  https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9877.xml
>> 
>> This diff file shows all changes from the approved I-D:
>>  https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9877-diff.html
>>  https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9877-rfcdiff.html (side by side)
>> 
>> This diff file shows the changes made during AUTH48 thus far:
>>  https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9877-auth48diff.html
>>  https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9877-auth48rfcdiff.html (side by side)
>> 
>> Re: Section 1, in addition to removing 'they' as Tom requested, we've 
>> removed the comma and updated to 'features' plural. Previously, the comma 
>> indicated two independent clauses.
>> 
>> Original:
>>   Indentation and whitespace in examples are provided only to
>>   illustrate element relationships, and are not a required feature of
>>   this specification.
>> 
>> Current text:
>>   Indentation and whitespace in examples are provided only to
>>   illustrate element relationships and are not required features
>>   of this specification.
>> 
>> Alternatively, please let us know if you prefer:
>>   In examples, indentation and whitespace are provided only to
>>   illustrate element relationships: neither is a required feature
>>   of this specification.
>> 
>> We will wait to hear from you again and from your coauthors
>> before continuing the publication process. This page shows
>> the AUTH48 status of your document:
>>  https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9877
> 
> Thanks for these updates.  The suggested text (i.e. "Indentation and
> whitespace in examples are provided only to illustrate element
> relationships and are not required features of this specification")
> looks fine to me.  I approve for publication.
> 
> -Tom
-- 
auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to