Hi Rich and Nimrod, Thank you for your replies! We made the change to the Introduction. All of our questions have now been addressed except for question #1. We are still waiting for Paul (AD) to comment on that one.
Please review the document carefully to ensure satisfaction as we do not make changes once it has been published as an RFC. Contact us with any further updates or with your approval of the document in its current form. We will await approvals from each author prior to moving forward in the publication process. The files are listed below (please refresh). Updated XML file: https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9852.xml Updated output files: https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9852.txt https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9852.pdf https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9852.html Diff files showing all changes made during AUTH48: https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9852-auth48diff.html https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9852-auth48rfcdiff.html (side by side) Diff files showing all changes: https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9852-diff.html https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9852-rfcdiff.html (side by side) For the AUTH48 status of this document, please see: https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9852 Best regards, Rebecca VanRheenen RFC Production Center > On Jan 7, 2026, at 5:44 AM, Salz, Rich <[email protected]> > wrote: > > • Perhaps (remove sentence in first paragraph and update the sentence in > the third paragraph as follows): > • This document updates [RFC9325]. It discusses post-quantum > • cryptography and the security and privacy improvements in TLS 1.3 as > • the rationale for the update. See Section 5. > > Yes, please make that change. -- auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
