On Wed, Jan 7, 2026 at 3:15 PM Rebecca VanRheenen < [email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Rich, Nimrod, and *Paul, > > Rich, we did not make any changes to your entry in the Authors’ Addresses > section. Thanks for letting us know your preference about the street > address. > > Nimrod, we marked your approval on the AUTH48 status page for this > document: https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9852. > > *Paul, as AD, please review the following question and let us know your > thoughts. Note that Rich and Nimrod are fine with the current assignment of > BCP 195 if you concur. Both authors have approved the document, so once you > have addressed this question, we will begin to prepare the document for > publication. > > > 1) <!-- [rfced] Authors and *AD - We have marked this document as part of > > BCP 195 because it updates RFC 9325, which is part of BCP 195. However, > > please review and let us know if this document should be assigned a new > > BCP number instead. > That makes sense. Approved. Paul > > > If needed, the complete list of BCPs is available here: > > https://www.rfc-editor.org/bcps > > --> > > Best regards, > > Rebecca VanRheenen > RFC Production Center > > > > > > On Jan 7, 2026, at 11:41 AM, Nimrod Aviram <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Hi Rebecca, > > > > Looks good to me too. > > I also approve, thanks a lot for your help! > > > > best wishes, > > Nimrod > > > > > > On Wed, 7 Jan 2026 at 20:29, Rebecca VanRheenen < > [email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Rich and Nimrod, > > > > Thank you for your replies! We made the change to the Introduction. All > of our questions have now been addressed except for question #1. We are > still waiting for Paul (AD) to comment on that one. > > > > Please review the document carefully to ensure satisfaction as we do not > make changes once it has been published as an RFC. Contact us with any > further updates or with your approval of the document in its current form. > We will await approvals from each author prior to moving forward in the > publication process. > > > > The files are listed below (please refresh). > > > > Updated XML file: > > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9852.xml > > > > Updated output files: > > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9852.txt > > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9852.pdf > > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9852.html > > > > Diff files showing all changes made during AUTH48: > > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9852-auth48diff.html > > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9852-auth48rfcdiff.html (side > by side) > > > > Diff files showing all changes: > > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9852-diff.html > > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9852-rfcdiff.html (side by side) > > > > For the AUTH48 status of this document, please see: > > https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9852 > > > > Best regards, > > > > Rebecca VanRheenen > > RFC Production Center > > > > > > > > > On Jan 7, 2026, at 5:44 AM, Salz, Rich <rsalz= > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > • Perhaps (remove sentence in first paragraph and update the > sentence in the third paragraph as follows): > > > • This document updates [RFC9325]. It discusses post-quantum > > > • cryptography and the security and privacy improvements in TLS > 1.3 as > > > • the rationale for the update. See Section 5. > > > > > > Yes, please make that change. > > > >
-- auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
