Hi Rich, Thanks for the quick reply and glad to hear you like the appearance of the HTML!
We’ve marked your approval on the AUTH48 status page for this document: https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9852. A street address in the Authors’ Addresses section is optional (see Section 4.12 of RFC 7322), so including it is completely up to you! Would you like to include it, or do you prefer the current? If it helps, I looked at the last few RFCs that you have authored (i.e., RFCs 9748, 9525, 9501), and no street address was listed for those. If you choose to include the street address for this document, we’ll include it in RFC-to-be 9851 as well. Best regards, Rebecca VanRheenen RFC Production Center > On Jan 7, 2026, at 11:07 AM, Salz, Rich <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I read the HTML (and am totally digging the boldness of the section headers, > etc.) and it looks good. Do you want a more complete street address for me? > If so, it’s > Akamai Technologies > 145 Boadway > Cambridge, MA 02142 > > Either way, I approve and thanks for all your fixes! > From: Rebecca VanRheenen <[email protected]> > Date: Wednesday, January 7, 2026 at 1:30 PM > To: Salz, Rich <[email protected]>, [email protected] > <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, > [email protected] <[email protected]> > Cc: RFC Editor <[email protected]>, [email protected] > <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, > [email protected] <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9852 <draft-ietf-uta-require-tls13-12> > for your review > > !-------------------------------------------------------------------| > This Message Is From an External Sender > This message came from outside your organization. > |-------------------------------------------------------------------! > > Hi Rich and Nimrod, > > Thank you for your replies! We made the change to the Introduction. All of > our questions have now been addressed except for question #1. We are still > waiting for Paul (AD) to comment on that one. > > Please review the document carefully to ensure satisfaction as we do not make > changes once it has been published as an RFC. Contact us with any further > updates or with your approval of the document in its current form. We will > await approvals from each author prior to moving forward in the publication > process. > > The files are listed below (please refresh). > > Updated XML file: > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9852.xml__;!!GjvTz_vk!Unf1DRhcqbxzGm7FRwLhNcK8fFRY-eEDcAAHKGaGkpGaGmg98c0LZhoryHGg_XcF3ToV7U8GTQIUYAcWTQoUi2WgCKQ$ > > Updated output files: > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9852.txt__;!!GjvTz_vk!Unf1DRhcqbxzGm7FRwLhNcK8fFRY-eEDcAAHKGaGkpGaGmg98c0LZhoryHGg_XcF3ToV7U8GTQIUYAcWTQoU-44Vir8$ > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9852.pdf__;!!GjvTz_vk!Unf1DRhcqbxzGm7FRwLhNcK8fFRY-eEDcAAHKGaGkpGaGmg98c0LZhoryHGg_XcF3ToV7U8GTQIUYAcWTQoUFeYQ9V8$ > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9852.html__;!!GjvTz_vk!Unf1DRhcqbxzGm7FRwLhNcK8fFRY-eEDcAAHKGaGkpGaGmg98c0LZhoryHGg_XcF3ToV7U8GTQIUYAcWTQoUc6LfYv0$ > > Diff files showing all changes made during AUTH48: > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9852-auth48diff.html__;!!GjvTz_vk!Unf1DRhcqbxzGm7FRwLhNcK8fFRY-eEDcAAHKGaGkpGaGmg98c0LZhoryHGg_XcF3ToV7U8GTQIUYAcWTQoUes41O5g$ > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9852-auth48rfcdiff.html__;!!GjvTz_vk!Unf1DRhcqbxzGm7FRwLhNcK8fFRY-eEDcAAHKGaGkpGaGmg98c0LZhoryHGg_XcF3ToV7U8GTQIUYAcWTQoU_FlYlWY$ > (side by side) > > Diff files showing all changes: > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9852-diff.html__;!!GjvTz_vk!Unf1DRhcqbxzGm7FRwLhNcK8fFRY-eEDcAAHKGaGkpGaGmg98c0LZhoryHGg_XcF3ToV7U8GTQIUYAcWTQoUNdNn4sU$ > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9852-rfcdiff.html__;!!GjvTz_vk!Unf1DRhcqbxzGm7FRwLhNcK8fFRY-eEDcAAHKGaGkpGaGmg98c0LZhoryHGg_XcF3ToV7U8GTQIUYAcWTQoUvZGxz_g$ > (side by side) > > For the AUTH48 status of this document, please see: > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9852__;!!GjvTz_vk!Unf1DRhcqbxzGm7FRwLhNcK8fFRY-eEDcAAHKGaGkpGaGmg98c0LZhoryHGg_XcF3ToV7U8GTQIUYAcWTQoU4TQ068I$ > > Best regards, > > Rebecca VanRheenen > RFC Production Center > > > > > On Jan 7, 2026, at 5:44 AM, Salz, Rich <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > • Perhaps (remove sentence in first paragraph and update the sentence > > in the third paragraph as follows): > > • This document updates [RFC9325]. It discusses post-quantum > > • cryptography and the security and privacy improvements in TLS 1.3 as > > • the rationale for the update. See Section 5. > > > > Yes, please make that change. > -- auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
