On Thu, 2010-09-30 at 10:43 +0200, Nino Novak wrote: > On Thursday 30 September 2010 10:17, Jean Hollis Weber wrote: > > > Just put a marker on the pages that they are no longer being > > maintained and abandon them until/unless someone can take on the job > > and do it. > > From a user's viewpoint I'd wish that any document prominently shows the > date of its last review (and the OOo Version used) without the need to > download/read the the document itself. A pointer (URL) to the place > where the most actual documents can be found would be fine also.
The PDFs of the user guides (stored on the wiki) do show this info. The wiki pages mostly don't. If/when we did a full replacement of the content of those pages, that could be part of the info added. I agree, it's important info, and I've been thinking about how to provide it -- at the moment the wiki pages are all over the place in terms of OOo version, so it's not easily automated. > 1. > Do we have any clue how many people (users) actually read the wiki docs > (e.g. a log file analysis of referrers like search engines or forum > articles and so on) ? Do the numbers show any change during time? Are > there preferred documents? That I don't know. > 2. > I don't know exactly but my impression is that a lot of translation work > has been done starting from the wiki docs - so I'd suggest to ask the > translation folks, too. However, I don't know how to contact them best > - maybe through the NLC leads? I had thought that most of the translation was done from the ODTs, but you may be right. Yes, we should find out before doing something too drastic. --Jean --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
