On 09/30/10 10:43, Nino Novak wrote:
On Thursday 30 September 2010 10:17, Jean Hollis Weber wrote:
Just put a marker on the pages that they are no longer being
maintained and abandon them until/unless someone can take on the job
and do it.
From a user's viewpoint I'd wish that any document prominently shows the
date of its last review (and the OOo Version used) without the need to
download/read the the document itself. A pointer (URL) to the place
where the most actual documents can be found would be fine also.
This can be done on one level in the Wiki using the FlaggedRevisions - which is
installed on the Wiki, but not enabled.
1.
Do we have any clue how many people (users) actually read the wiki docs
(e.g. a log file analysis of referrers like search engines or forum
articles and so on) ? Do the numbers show any change during time? Are
there preferred documents?
Each page in the Wiki has a view count... I just did a random page check of
various user guide pages... the show between 4,000 and 12,000 page views (since
the page was added) with a few higher, and a few lower... so they are not being
ignored or unused.... although some of those views are from the editing
process... but it won't account for more than a few tens of page views out of
the thousands recorded.
2.
I don't know exactly but my impression is that a lot of translation work
has been done starting from the wiki docs - so I'd suggest to ask the
translation folks, too. However, I don't know how to contact them best
- maybe through the NLC leads?
This is a good point. There is a lot of translation work being done starting
from the Wiki versions of pages... not just of the user guides, but other docs
as well.
C.
--
Clayton Cornell [email protected]
OpenOffice.org Documentation Project co-lead
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
