Hello Jean,
On 9 November 2010 10:01, Jean Hollis Weber <[email protected]> wrote: > I have changed the old blue of the headings to the new blue, even though > it seems a bit gaudy to me... but the only other choice is black, which > seems a bit stark. Thoughts? I found the blue a bit too light and it does not match the blue used in the OOoAuthors logo or the hyperlink blue. I am OK with it, but I think we should change at least align the hyperlink colour to match the heading colour. > > I have also simplified the table style to a more modern look, one which > is also easier to maintain, and made some other minor tweaks. I agree that it is easier to maintain, but I think that for readability purposes we should keep the banded rows. > Other comments: - the OOoTableText (Caption) and OOoTableText(CaptionNumber) should be a bit smaller (10.4 instead of the current 11) - OOoHeader and OOoFooter font size should be aligned with the body text size. - we should add a note discouraging the use of OOoHeading4 - I do not like the heading numbering but some people seem to like it. Maybe we should have a voting :-) - In the cross referencing section we can now refer to the numbered items using cross referencing. - The title page looks a bit dull without any graphics. - we may need to add a bit more information in the Character styles section on how to deal with dialog names, tabs(pages) names. If I remember correctly the agreement is to use OOoEmphasis the first time the dialog or tab is introduced, and use OOoDefault afterwards. - OOoContents3 should have a bit of above paragraph space (3pt?). That will make the ToC look a bit less cramped. - Also on the ToC (again I am not a fan, but it is common practice) OOoContents1 could be made bold. Cheers, Michele --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
