On Wed, 2012-05-30 at 14:41 -0700, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> On 30.05.2012 [18:26:58 -0300], Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues wrote:
> > On Wed, 2012-05-30 at 14:23 -0700, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> > > On 26.05.2012 [18:03:31 -0300], Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 2012-05-25 at 16:31 -0700, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> > > > > Sometimes there are firewalls between test machines and the greater
> > > > > Internet, so it seems unwise to depend upon external network access in
> > > > > the boottool/grubby building code. But some sites won't have those
> > > > > restrictions. Add the ability to configure a local mirror for the 
> > > > > grubby
> > > > > tarball in the CLIENT section, but default to the external location.
> > > > 
> > > > The problem with this patch is that makes boottool dependent on autotest
> > > > libraries, when the script itself is sometimes used in a stand alone
> > > > fashion. Therefore, I can't accept this as is.
> > > 
> > > Ah makes sense. I didn't realize boottool was used stand-alone, sorry.
> > > 
> > > > Cleber, I believe we should try to locate and download boottool from the
> > > > copy present in the autotest tree, before trying to reach out to github.
> > > > What do you say?
> > > 
> > > Ah I didn't even realize there was one in client/deps/grubby -- so,
> > > would we try and push it out with the rest of autotest? I'm not sure
> > > pulling will work, as the client/deps/grubby path isn't guaranteed (nor
> > > is it setup to be, afaict) part of the web-exposed path.
> > 
> > This is what I'd like to do, find a way to ensure the grubby tarball
> > gets copied when the client is installed. This way we wouldn't ever have
> > to resort to an external copy.
> 
> Sounds like a plan -- in theory could we simply add it to the rsync'd
> path(s)?
> 
> And then update the grubby code to look locally only?

Yes, and yes!

> This also makes it easier to keep things in-sync -- rather than relying
> on either a local or remote mirror to have the appropriate version of
> the tarball, we can ensure version updates and the tarball updates
> happen in the same commit.

I agree, it'll make our lives easier.

> Thanks,
> Nish
> 


_______________________________________________
Autotest mailing list
[email protected]
http://test.kernel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/autotest

Reply via email to