On 31.05.2012 [16:28:23 -0300], Cleber Rosa wrote: > On 05/31/2012 04:21 PM, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues wrote: > >On Thu, 2012-05-31 at 16:11 -0300, Cleber Rosa wrote: > >>On 05/31/2012 04:04 PM, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > >>>Sorry for not replying to your other e-mail -- I've had some power > >>>issues at home. I agree we are in agreement :) > >>> > >>>Are you working on implementing any of this? > >>*Right now* I'm focusing on giving your cobbler integration patchset a > >>last set of tests, which I hope will be done by tomorrow. BTW, sorry for > >>taking that long to review/test/commit it. PTO and moving home had an > >>played a role in the delay. > >About the cobbler patchset, let's remember that we have quite a lot of > >unittests to fix before it's good to go. I started fixing some, but had > >to stop to do other stuff. > > Yep, that's being accounted for :)
One thing I'm aware of as being a gap -- is metahost provisioning. That is, I think it's reasonable to say, I want my job to run on any ppc64 box running rhel6.2. So I think that would require adding a provision drop-down to the "Run on any hosts with label" section that gets populated based upon the selection in the current label drop-down with the available images? Thanks, Nish P.S. I don't think this blocks inclusion, it's a use-case I hadn't considered, and I *believe* the metahosts should just work as-is, but always using the current profile. -- Nishanth Aravamudan <[email protected]> IBM Linux Technology Center _______________________________________________ Autotest mailing list [email protected] http://test.kernel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/autotest
