On 05/31/2012 08:48 PM, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > On 31.05.2012 [16:28:23 -0300], Cleber Rosa wrote: >> On 05/31/2012 04:21 PM, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues wrote: >>> On Thu, 2012-05-31 at 16:11 -0300, Cleber Rosa wrote: >>>> On 05/31/2012 04:04 PM, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: >>>>> Sorry for not replying to your other e-mail -- I've had some power >>>>> issues at home. I agree we are in agreement :) >>>>> >>>>> Are you working on implementing any of this? >>>> *Right now* I'm focusing on giving your cobbler integration patchset a >>>> last set of tests, which I hope will be done by tomorrow. BTW, sorry for >>>> taking that long to review/test/commit it. PTO and moving home had an >>>> played a role in the delay. >>> About the cobbler patchset, let's remember that we have quite a lot of >>> unittests to fix before it's good to go. I started fixing some, but had >>> to stop to do other stuff. >> Yep, that's being accounted for :) > One thing I'm aware of as being a gap -- is metahost provisioning. > > That is, I think it's reasonable to say, I want my job to run on any > ppc64 box running rhel6.2. > > So I think that would require adding a provision drop-down to the "Run > on any hosts with label" section that gets populated based upon the > selection in the current label drop-down with the available images?
Yep, makes sense. > > Thanks, > Nish > > P.S. I don't think this blocks inclusion, it's a use-case I hadn't > considered, and I *believe* the metahosts should just work as-is, but > always using the current profile. IMHO it's not a good time to rewind and tackle this, let's do it right after the inclusion of the original patchset. _______________________________________________ Autotest mailing list [email protected] http://test.kernel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/autotest
