> I propose that we change this to org.apache.framework.* - My reasoning is
> simple. A naive user who wants to know what Avalon is will assume
> it is the
> classes in org.apache.avalon.* (seems logical right?).
question: why isn't it? Believe I said this before, but the _most_
logical thing to do would be have _everything_ under
org.apache.jakarta.avalon.*. Ditching "jakarta" as that is not
common practice:
org.apache.avalon.framework
org.apache.avalon.excalibur
org.apache.avalon.phoenix
org.apache.avalon.cornerstone
org.apache.avalon.logkit
become our main packages.
This provides the clean separation, reflects actual relationships
between packages better (phoenix has closer ties to cornerstone
than to, say, tomcat, so they need to be "more together", etc),
has the advertising, etc.
The only disadvantage: a few secs more to write import statements
(if you do that manually).
guess this is my counter-ditch effort ;)
> AvalonFramework.jar or avalon-framework.jar
> AvalonExcalibur.jar or avalon-excalibur.jar
+1 to this one =)
cheers!
LSD
<java:sig>
About LSD = new PersonalInfo();
LSD.name("Leo Simons");
LSD.email("[EMAIL PROTECTED]");
LSD.URL( [
http://www.leosimons.com, // personal website
http://www.atfantasy.com, // fantasy RPG portal
http://www.the-sign.nl // web-design company
] );
LSD.quote("Buh!");
email.setSig((String)LSD);
</java:sig>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
