Giacomo Pati wrote:
>
> Quoting Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > > I propose that we change this to org.apache.framework.* - My reasoning
> > is
> > > simple. A naive user who wants to know what Avalon is will assume
> > > it is the
> > > classes in org.apache.avalon.* (seems logical right?).
> >
> > question: why isn't it? Believe I said this before, but the _most_
> > logical thing to do would be have _everything_ under
> > org.apache.jakarta.avalon.*. Ditching "jakarta" as that is not
> > common practice:
> >
> > org.apache.avalon.framework
> > org.apache.avalon.excalibur
> > org.apache.avalon.phoenix
> > org.apache.avalon.cornerstone
> > org.apache.avalon.logkit
>
> +1 for me. I thought of it earlier but was not willing to influence your debats
> about branding Avalon. IMHO this would complete the branding of Avalon.
+1 from me. It solves all of our concerns and promotes Avalon as the
container for everything.
This is a relatively easy change, and it will be easy enough for the
conversion script to adjust to.
> > > AvalonFramework.jar or avalon-framework.jar
> > > AvalonExcalibur.jar or avalon-excalibur.jar
> >
> > +1 to this one =)
+1 from me.
I can easily change the build script to reflect this:
avalon-framework.jar
avalon-excalibur.jar
(This is the current pattern we are using for naming jars).
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
