I prefer to see seperation. Currently the build procedures for the service management stuff is maintained over on apps/enterprise because its so much easier to keep control over under a single dedicated build environment - attempting to maintain this in excalibur general build (currently version 110) isn't viable.
Cheers, Steve. > -----Original Message----- > From: Eung-ju Park [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, 14 March, 2002 11:21 > To: Avalon Developers List > Subject: Re: The great excalibur adventure! > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Paul Hammant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Avalon Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 6:44 PM > Subject: Re: The great excalibur adventure! > > > > Peter, > > > > My own view is that *no changes* to the source tree are needed. > I think > > it is only an issue for jaring. > > I agree with Paul's opinion. > > > > > excalibur-logger-4.1.2.jar etc. > > > > Each time I see a disparate source tree, when one could have done, then > > my heart breaks a little. (Don't beat me with apps/ ;-) > > > > - PAul > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
