On Thu, 14 Mar 2002 20:44, Paul Hammant wrote:
> Peter,
>
> My own view is that *no changes* to the source tree are needed. I think
> it is only an issue for jaring.
>
> excalibur-logger-4.1.2.jar etc.
>
> Each time I see a disparate source tree, when one could have done, then
> my heart breaks a little. (Don't beat me with apps/ ;-)
The problem is then it is massively harder for people to come and look at
things and adopt them. I have tried to get people to adopt stuff from
excalibur inside my company but they looked at size of excalibur and
basically said no.
Breaking them down into source tree makes it much easier for people to take
the little bits piecemeal if they want to and need to. Separate sourfce trees
also makes it much easier to develope and track inter-package dependencies.
--
Cheers,
Pete
---------------------------------------------------
"Wise men don't need advice. Fools don't take it."
-Benjamin Franklin
---------------------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
