Peter, OK I withdraw my objection on two grounds.
1) not excalibur is mature and large, it could be splitup for understandability's sake. 2) I am not a big excalibur contributor so should shut up. Try to make it as KISS like as possible though. - Paul >On Thu, 14 Mar 2002 20:44, Paul Hammant wrote: > >>Peter, >> >>My own view is that *no changes* to the source tree are needed. I think >>it is only an issue for jaring. >> >> excalibur-logger-4.1.2.jar etc. >> >>Each time I see a disparate source tree, when one could have done, then >>my heart breaks a little. (Don't beat me with apps/ ;-) >> > >The problem is then it is massively harder for people to come and look at >things and adopt them. I have tried to get people to adopt stuff from >excalibur inside my company but they looked at size of excalibur and >basically said no. > >Breaking them down into source tree makes it much easier for people to take >the little bits piecemeal if they want to and need to. Separate sourfce trees >also makes it much easier to develope and track inter-package dependencies. > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
