We are centered around the concept of components, and I would not like that to get lost.
Using the comments from Jason, perhaps something like this: "Avalon Component System" Simple, to the point, and allows for a broad range of sub projects. > -----Original Message----- > From: Berin Loritsch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 11:10 AM > To: 'Avalon Developers List' > Subject: RE: [Vote] Logo & banding > > > Good points, Jason. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 11:01 AM > > To: Avalon Developers List > > Subject: RE: [Vote] Logo & banding > > > > > > On Tue, 2002-04-02 at 10:45, Berin Loritsch wrote: > > > So I take it you guys didn't like > > > > > > "Apache Component Architecture"? > > > > > > I received no comment, so I don't know if you all saw it yet.... > > > > I certainly don't mean to be rude, and I don't want to start > > a fight but I think it's somewhat unjustified in using the > > Apache name instead of your project name to promote your > > project specific solutions. I never call Turbine the "Apache > > Webapplication Framework" because that would be unfair to > > both Struts and Cocoon. > > > > Turbine has been used for more the webapps and could be > > called an application framework, and the commons will more > > than likely evolve into a component framework. I don't think > > you can fairly use a name like "Apache Foo Bar" without the > > buy in from the rest of Apache. > > > > If Struts evolved into an application framework, Turbine did > > the same and the commons became a component framework and the > > former used "Apache Application Framework" and the latter > > used "Apache Component Framework" it would get pretty > > confusing pretty fast. > > > > I think it is most fair to all projects here to use your > > project name when promoting your project and not the Apache name. > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Leo Sutic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 10:24 AM > > > > To: Avalon Developers List > > > > Subject: RE: [Vote] Logo & banding > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Paul Hammant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > > > > > > Peter, Leo, Berin, > > > > > > > > > > >On Wed, 3 Apr 2002 00:34, Leo Simons wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > >>What about "Apache Application Architecture" > > > > > >>or "Common Application Architecture"? > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >I like > > > > > > > > > > > Me too, despite the recent service 'offences' against the > > > > > component > > > > > name. > > > > > > > > > > Having said that CAA is already used with the same > > meaning in the > > > > > world > > > > > of IBM minicomputers. We should be careful to use > > Avalon Common > > > > > Application Architecture (ACAA). > > > > > > > > "Apache Common Architecture" ? Just trying to fit "Apache" in > > > > there without making it too long. > > > > > > > > /LS > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > > > <mailto:avalon-dev-> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > For > > > > additional commands, > > > > e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > <mailto:avalon-dev-> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > For > > additional commands, > > e-mail: > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -- > > jvz. > > > > Jason van Zyl > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > http://tambora.zenplex.org > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:avalon-dev-> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For > additional commands, > e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:avalon-dev-> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For > additional commands, > e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
