Jason, Small pedantic point inline....
>>So I take it you guys didn't like >> >>"Apache Component Architecture"? >> >>I received no comment, so I don't know if you all saw it yet.... >> > >I certainly don't mean to be rude, and I don't want to start a fight but >I think it's somewhat unjustified in using the Apache name instead of >your project name to promote your project specific solutions. I never >call Turbine the "Apache Webapplication Framework" because that would be >unfair to both Struts and Cocoon. > We have been using "Avalon : Apache Server Framework" for 11 months now in the front Avalon page logo : http://jakarta.apache.org/avalon/ >Turbine has been used for more the webapps and could be called an >application framework, and the commons will more than likely evolve into >a component framework. I don't think you can fairly use a name like >"Apache Foo Bar" without the buy in from the rest of Apache. > >If Struts evolved into an application framework, Turbine did the same >and the commons became a component framework and the former used "Apache >Application Framework" and the latter used "Apache Component Framework" >it would get pretty confusing pretty fast. > >I think it is most fair to all projects here to use your project name >when promoting your project and not the Apache name. > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
