From: "Leo Sutic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Was there any concensus on what to do with
> framework? Do we go with:
>
> org.apache.avalon.framework
> org.apache.avalon
> org.apache.framework
Then, why not rename Avalon to . ?
Yeah, let's take out the name Avalon alltogether!
Sorry if I intervene here, but as a heavy avalon user, I would like to
remind all that we are dead tired of changing package names.
org.apache.avalon.framework is ok, or does making it shorter improve the
code? :-P
Sorry, but these changes are quite frustrating and unnecessary...
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
