Leo Sutic wrote:
>
> Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
>
>> From: "Leo Sutic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>>>Was there any concensus on what to do with
>>>framework? Do we go with:
>>>
>>>org.apache.avalon.framework
>>>org.apache.avalon
>>>org.apache.framework
>>
>>
>>Then, why not rename Avalon to . ?
>
>
> +1000
>
> org.apache.avalon.framework =>
>___._.__..._.__..__._........_..._._._..____...._.._..___.._____._._._
>
> which should have many advantages, the least of those being easy application of
>checksums to import statements when we do make the move to just:
>
> ___._.__..._.__..__._........_..._._._..____..
>
>
> I see no need for a lengthy 6 hours of maintaining backward compatibility with this.
?? What??
--
"They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
deserve neither liberty nor safety."
- Benjamin Franklin
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
