Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
> From: "Leo Sutic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>>Was there any concensus on what to do with
>>framework? Do we go with:
>>
>>org.apache.avalon.framework
>>org.apache.avalon
>>org.apache.framework
>
>
> Then, why not rename Avalon to . ?
+1000
org.apache.avalon.framework =>
___._.__..._.__..__._........_..._._._..____...._.._..___.._____._._._
which should have many advantages, the least of those being easy application of
checksums to import statements when we do make the move to just:
___._.__..._.__..__._........_..._._._..____..
I see no need for a lengthy 6 hours of maintaining backward compatibility with this.
/LS
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
