> From: Leo Simons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > That would make (on official voting): > > > > ServiceLocator (XXXXLocator): 3 (Me, Leo Sutic, Stephen McConnel) > > ComponentDirectory: 2 (Leo Simmons, MarcusCrafter) > > I'm okay with ComponentXXXX (within some limits). I don't > think it is smart to start using the word "service"...it > might look good in management meetings ("so, does it support > Web Services?"), but it is blurry. > > I'll even give you a -1 on that if neccessary :P. We do COP > here, not SOP. Or are we changing that too? > > - Leo
A conclusion that the JSF folks agreed upon is that a Service is just another type of component. It's scope is a larger one than the traditional component. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
