> From: Leo Sutic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > From: Berin Loritsch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > ServiceLocator (XXXXLocator): 3 (Me, Leo Sutic, Stephen McConnel) > > Can someone to a newbie check on "You get your *Components* > from the *Service*Locator"? > > I was against ServiceLocator not because I didn't see > Components as being/providing a service, but if we are > talking about Components, then we should apply that name throughout. > > I really dislike the shift in terminology we have here...
Leo, I hear you loud and clear. However you are adding things in this thread that need to be handled in a different thread. ComponentLocator--fine. Not a big deal, really. As to ComponentLocator->ComponentManager->Component, I think you are on crack, but that is a different thread. <snip>everything that does not have to do with the name of the component lookup service</snip> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
