Paulo Gaspar wrote:
>>>That's also why many outsiders say: "Hey, we have commons-logging,
>>>JNDI, JMX, why do you want to rewrite all?".
>>
>
> Bad example.
Bzzzz wrong. It's a good example.
That *exactly what users from the *outside* of Jakarta say.
> The commons-logging guys were the ones rewriting the
> Avalon stuff. They might have started earlier, but by December the
> Avalon logging stuff was MUCH more advanced and smoe of them just
> refused to look at it.
*This* is the point.
If Avalon's was so good why did they rewrite it?
> What Pete says about the ego bits is the major problem. Most of the
> commons and Tomcat guys complaining did not even care to know what
> they are talking about.
The ego stuff goes two ways ;-)
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>