Leo Simons wrote:
>>The reason Avalon is complex is that committers get a great deal of
>>personal satisfaction from making it complex. The only thing that could
>>be better would be to make it even more complex. Wait ! Here's a new
>>feature with 3 new permutations. Let's add that too! No, let's start a
>>whole new container. That's the ticket! Or should it be 3, one for each
>>permutation? Hmm.
>
>
> please. Don't.
please. *Don't*.
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Re: organisation of avalon subprojects Paul Hammant
- One Container Revisited Pete Carapetyan
- Re: One Container Revisited Stephen McConnell
- Re: One Container Revisited Pete Carapetyan
- RE: One Container Revisited Stephen Haberman
- Re: One Container Revisited Stephen McConnell
- Re: One Container Revisited Pete Carapetyan
- Re: One Container Revisited Peter Donald
- Re: One Container Revisited Stephen McConnell
- 'personal attacks' revisited (Re: One ... Leo Simons
- Re: One Container Revisited Nicola Ken Barozzi
- Re: One Container Revisited Adam Rossi
- RE: One Container Revisited Leo Sutic
- Re: One Container Revisited Michael Nash
- RE: One Container Revisited Leo Sutic
- RE: One Container Revisited Peter Donald
- Re: One Container Revisited Stephen McConnell
- RE: One Container Revisited Leo Sutic
- RE: One Container Revisited Adam Rossi
- Re: One Container Revisited Nicola Ken Barozzi
- Re: One Container Revisited Peter Donald
