At 05:36 PM 7/1/2002 +0200, you wrote:
>Keeping *both* sides (container writer / container user) simple is
>another goal... Too much complexity in the container -> crap container
>-> implosion.
>
>I agree that the above argument may sound like a non-argument ("we can't
>do that because, well, we can't do such things") and I have no proof
>that
>three containers with common core set of libraries is simpler, it is
>just what I as an Avalon developer suspect.
It is technically feasible to have one container and even relatively simple
if you layer the architecture properly.
Cheers,
Peter Donald
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Faced with the choice between changing one's mind,
and proving that there is no need to do so - almost
everyone gets busy on the proof."
- John Kenneth Galbraith
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
