RE: One Container Revisited

[Leo Sutic]

> From: Peter Donald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
>
> >I agree that the above argument may sound like a non-argument ("we 
> >can't do that because, well, we can't do such things") and I have no 
> >proof that three containers with common core set of libraries is 
> >simpler, it is just what I as an Avalon developer suspect.
> 
> It is technically feasible to have one container and even 
> relatively simple if you layer the architecture properly.

I shall await your simple one-size-fits-all container then. Because
Phoenix isn't it.

/LS


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>