Berin Loritsch wrote:
>>From: Nicola Ken Barozzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>
>>Basically, take the excalibur left-hand menu.
>>
>>- Containers -> stay in excalibur
>>- Components -> new cornerstone
>>- Resource Managers -> dunno
>>- Testing and Analysis -> dunno
>>- Utilities -> *all* to commons (except the ones improperly here)
>>
>>This is how I see the new excalibur, what do you think?
>>What should we do about Resource Managers? Make them just
>>new-cornerstone components?
>>Testing and Analysis can just remain part of excalibur.
>
>
>
> :/
>
> Resource Managers and Testing and Analysis should stay in
> Excalibur. We need the testing harness for components so
> that we can write proper tests for them.
I wrote: >>Testing and Analysis can just remain part of excalibur.
> The original concept was for Excalibur to house general Avalon
> components and Cornerstone to house Phoenix components. I would
> be -1 on any movement of the components to cornerstone until
> we have an official specification for Avalon components.
+1 Well, this was what I meant, I'm too proactive ;-)
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
